Home / Best Video Conferencing Software in 2026

Best Video Conferencing Software in 2026: 9 Tools Compared

Compare the best video conferencing software for teams and small business. We review nine tools on price, meeting limits, guest joining, and free plans.

Best Video Conferencing Software
  1. Editor's choice
    Zoom Workplace logoZoom Workplace

    Meeting-first teams and client calls

    Starts at$15.99 per user per month
    Visit zoom.usFull review
  2. Great alternative
    Microsoft Teams logoMicrosoft Teams

    Microsoft 365 teams

    Starts at$4.00 per user per month
    Visit microsoft.comFull review
  3. Also consider
    Google Meet logoGoogle Meet

    Google Workspace teams

    Starts at$7.00 per user per month
    Visit meet.google.comFull review

TL;DR:

  • Zoom remains the most meeting-focused choice for teams that run calls with clients outside their own company.
  • Microsoft Teams and Google Meet often win on value, since many teams already pay for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace.
  • Webex suits larger or regulated teams that need strong admin controls and compliance features.
  • Jitsi Meet is the best free option for simple calls, with no account needed for guests in many setups.
  • Free plans all cap group meeting length or size, so check those limits before you rely on a free tier for work.

Quick comparison

ToolBest forStarts atFree plan?
Zoom WorkplaceMeeting-first teams and client calls$15.99 per user per monthYesVisit
Microsoft TeamsMicrosoft 365 teams$4.00 per user per monthYesVisit
Google MeetGoogle Workspace teams$7.00 per user per monthYesVisit
WebexEnterprise security and controls$14.50 per user per monthYesVisit
GoTo MeetingSimple and reliable meetings$12.00 per organizer per monthNoVisit
Zoho MeetingBudget small business meetings$3.00 per host per monthYesVisit
Jitsi MeetFree open source meetingsFreeYesVisit
RingCentralVoice, video, and messaging in one place$20.00 per user per monthNoVisit
Slack HuddlesQuick team huddles inside Slack$7.25 per user per monthNoVisit

The best video conferencing software

We compared official feature pages, pricing, app store listings, privacy policies, and public reviews to judge meeting quality, limits, integrations, and value. Prices shown are entry paid prices from vendor pages and recent comparisons, and they can change with billing period and plan.

Zoom Workplace logo
#1

Zoom Workplace

Best for: Meeting-first teams and client calls

Visit zoom.us
Starts at$15.99 per user per month
Free plan?Yes
Zoom Workplace website
zoom.us homepage

Zoom fits a team that runs most of its work through video calls, especially with clients who use different systems. Guests can join from a link with little setup, and hosts get breakout rooms, polls, whiteboard, and recording on paid plans. The AI Companion summary features on paid plans also help teams that run many meetings each week.

The free plan caps group meetings at 40 minutes for up to 100 people, which is too short for many work calls. Paid plans start at $15.99 per user per month on monthly billing in recent vendor comparisons, with lower annual rates in some listings. Check the current pricing page for your billing choice before you budget.

Pros
  • Familiar joining experience
  • Breakout rooms and whiteboard
  • Webinar and room options
Cons
  • Paid features can feel like more than a small team needs
  • Price rises with add-ons
Microsoft Teams logo
#2

Microsoft Teams

Best for: Microsoft 365 teams

Visit microsoft.com
Starts at$4.00 per user per month
Free plan?Yes
Microsoft Teams website
microsoft.com homepage

Teams suits a company that already lives in Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Meetings, chat, channels, and files sit together, so a call can turn into a shared document without switching apps. The standalone Teams Essentials plan starts at $4.00 per user per month, and business plans add larger meetings and more storage.

For a team that does not use Microsoft 365, Teams can feel like a large system for a simple call. The free version caps group meetings at 60 minutes for up to 100 people, which is useful for short calls but not for a full workday of meetings. Choose Teams when the suite around it is already part of your workflow.

Pros
  • Deep Microsoft 365 integration
  • Chat, files, and meetings in one place
  • Large meeting capacity on business plans
Cons
  • Setup can feel heavy for a small team
  • Best value only if you already use Microsoft 365
Google Meet logo
#3

Google Meet

Best for: Google Workspace teams

Visit meet.google.com
Starts at$7.00 per user per month
Free plan?Yes
Google Meet website
meet.google.com homepage

Google Meet fits a team that schedules in Google Calendar and wants guests to join from a browser with no download. The interface is plain, screen sharing and captions are easy to find, and paid Workspace plans raise meeting size and add recording and noise cancellation. For a Google-first team, that simplicity is a real strength.

The free plan caps group calls at 60 minutes for up to 100 people, and one-to-one calls have a longer allowance. Meet is less focused on large public webinars than Zoom or dedicated webinar tools, so a team that runs big events may need an add-on or a second tool. For internal and client meetings, it is hard to beat for ease.

Pros
  • Browser-first joining
  • Strong Google Calendar integration
  • Simple guest experience
Cons
  • Fewer webinar features than Zoom
  • Full value needs a Workspace plan
Webex logo
#4

Webex

Best for: Enterprise security and controls

Visit webex.com
Starts at$14.50 per user per month
Free plan?Yes

Webex suits a larger company, a regulated team, or a Cisco hardware shop that needs tight admin control. It offers encryption, compliance features, and detailed admin settings, plus meeting, webinar, and contact center options in the wider suite. The free plan covers up to 100 people with a 40-minute group limit, which is useful for testing.

Price is the main drawback for a small team, since paid plans start around $14.50 per user per month in recent comparisons. A small business that only needs simple calls will find better value in Teams, Meet, or Zoho Meeting. Choose Webex when security, control, and scale matter more than the lowest price.

Pros
  • Strong security and compliance options
  • Admin controls
  • Large meeting and webinar options
Cons
  • Higher entry price than bundled rivals
  • Interface can feel formal for casual teams
GoTo Meeting logo
#5

GoTo Meeting

Best for: Simple and reliable meetings

Visit goto.com
Starts at$12.00 per organizer per month
Free plan?No

GoTo Meeting fits a small team that wants a dependable meeting tool without a large suite around it. Hosts can start a meeting quickly, share a screen, and use drawing tools, and guests join from a link. Paid plans start at $12.00 per organizer per month in recent comparisons, which keeps costs clear for a small host team.

The lack of a free plan makes it harder to test with a full team, and it does not match Zoom or Teams on chat, whiteboard depth, or app integrations. If your team only needs solid meetings and values a simple setup, GoTo Meeting is a calm, practical choice.

Pros
  • Straightforward setup
  • Reliable audio and video
  • Screen sharing and drawing tools
Cons
  • No free plan
  • Fewer modern collaboration extras than larger suites
Zoho Meeting logo
#6

Zoho Meeting

Best for: Budget small business meetings

Visit zoho.com
Starts at$3.00 per host per month
Free plan?Yes

Zoho Meeting suits a small business that already uses Zoho apps or wants the lowest paid entry point on this list. Meetings run in a browser, hosts can share screens and record on paid plans, and webinar features are available for events. The free plan covers group meetings up to 60 minutes for up to 100 people in recent listings.

The trade-off is ecosystem size. Integrations and third-party apps are fewer than those for Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet, and some useful features sit on higher plans. For a budget team that mainly needs reliable internal and client calls, Zoho Meeting offers strong value for the price.

Pros
  • Low entry price
  • Browser-based meetings
  • Webinar options on higher plans
Cons
  • Smaller integration library than Zoom or Teams
  • Some features need higher plans
Jitsi Meet logo
#7

Jitsi Meet

Best for: Free open source meetings

Visit jitsi.org
Starts atFree
Free plan?Yes

Jitsi Meet fits a team, school, or community group that needs free video calls without a subscription. You can start a meeting in a browser, share a link, and invite guests with little setup. For a team with privacy or control needs, self-hosting Jitsi gives more say over where meeting data runs.

The limits are support and polish. There is no large vendor support team behind a free public instance, and features such as advanced admin controls, webinars, and AI summaries are not the focus. For simple, reliable calls, Jitsi Meet is an excellent free tool, but a business that needs guaranteed support should look at a paid plan elsewhere.

Pros
  • Free to use
  • No account needed for many guest joins
  • Self-hosting option for control
Cons
  • Fewer admin and support features
  • Performance depends on hosting and connection
RingCentral logo
#8

RingCentral

Best for: Voice, video, and messaging in one place

Visit ringcentral.com
Starts at$20.00 per user per month
Free plan?No

RingCentral suits a company that wants phone calls, video meetings, and team messaging under one subscription. Staff can move from a phone call to a video meeting without changing apps, and admins get call routing, analytics, and controls. That unified setup helps sales and support teams that live on the phone as well as on video.

For a team that only needs video, RingCentral costs more than a meeting-only tool, with entry plans around $20.00 per user per month in recent comparisons. There is also more setup than a simple meeting app. Choose RingCentral when voice is a core part of your work, not just an extra feature.

Pros
  • Phone, video, and team messaging in one platform
  • Strong call handling
  • Admin controls
Cons
  • Higher entry price
  • More system than a team that only needs video calls
Slack Huddles logo
#9

Slack Huddles

Best for: Quick team huddles inside Slack

Visit slack.com
Starts at$7.25 per user per month
Free plan?No

Slack Huddles fit a team that already works in Slack and wants fast, informal calls without scheduling a formal meeting. A huddle can start in a channel or direct message, people can share screens, and the conversation stays close to the work thread. That low friction is ideal for quick questions, pair work, and daily check-ins.

Huddles are not a replacement for a full conferencing platform. Large scheduled meetings, webinars, breakout rooms, and external client calls are better served by Zoom, Teams, or Meet. Use Huddles for speed inside Slack, and keep a dedicated meeting tool for formal and external calls.

Pros
  • Instant audio and video inside Slack channels
  • Screen sharing
  • Low friction for existing Slack teams
Cons
  • Not a full meeting platform
  • Needs a paid Slack plan for video huddles with more features

How we picked these

We compared official feature pages, pricing, app store listings, privacy policies, and public reviews, and we favored tools that work in October 2026 for real teams, not just demos. We weighed meeting limits, guest experience, integrations, security controls, and price at the entry paid tier. We left out tools that had shut down or that only offered video as a minor add-on to an unrelated product.

What to check before you choose a video conferencing tool

Count how many people host meetings, not just how many people attend, since most tools charge per host or per user. Test a call with an outside guest, a screen share, and a weak connection, because those three cases expose most problems. Also check recording, captions, and storage rules, since those features often sit on higher plans.

Small business versus large team needs

A small business should favor low cost, simple joining, and a free plan for guests. A larger team should favor admin controls, security settings, single sign-on, and support response times. If your team already pays for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, start with Teams or Meet and only pay for a separate tool if a clear gap remains.

FAQ

What is the best video conferencing app for small business?

Zoom is a strong general pick for client calls, while Zoho Meeting offers the lowest paid entry point on this list. If your team already uses Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, Teams or Meet will usually offer better value. Test the free plan with real guests before you pay.

What is the best free video conferencing software?

Jitsi Meet is the best free option for simple calls, with no account needed for many guest joins. Google Meet and Zoom also offer free plans, but group meetings are capped at 60 minutes and 40 minutes in turn. For regular work meetings longer than those limits, a paid plan is usually needed.

What is the best platform for virtual meetings with clients?

Zoom is often the safest choice for client calls, since most clients already know how to join. Google Meet is a close second for browser-based joining, and Teams works well when the client also uses Microsoft 365. Send a test link before an important call to avoid joining problems.

What is the best online meeting software for webinars?

Zoom, Webex, and GoTo Meeting all offer webinar options, but webinar capacity and features are often sold as add-ons. Check attendee limits, registration, polls, and recording before you buy, since entry meeting plans may not include full webinar features. For small webinars, Zoho Meeting can also be a budget option.

How many people can join a video conference for free?

Most free plans allow up to 100 people, with Zoom at 40 minutes for group calls and Google Meet and Teams at 60 minutes for group calls. Jitsi Meet does not set the same account-based cap on its public service, but performance depends on connection and hosting. Always confirm the current limit on the vendor page before a large free call.

Sources

✓
Shihab Mia

I'm Shihab Mia, and I run LinkVetted. I vet every link placement against live Ahrefs data, and everything I publish follows the same standard I sell: verifiable claims and no inflated metrics.